Volume-11 , Issue-6 , Dec 2023, ISSN 2321-3256 (Electronic Version) Go Back

• Open Access   Article

  A Review on New Multilevel Scheduling Algorithm and SJF and Priority Scheduling Algorithms

  Irshad Khan, Mohd Owais, Saima Aleem, Tasleem Jamal

  Review Paper | Journal (IJSRNSC)

  Vol.11 , Issue.6 , pp.1-8, Dec-2023

  Abstract

  Full-Text HTML

  References

  Citation

  Abstract
  The two CPU scheduling algorithms that received the majority of our attention in this paper after reviewing a variety of CPU scheduling algorithms were the shortest job first and priority scheduling algorithms, as well as an improved priority scheduling algorithm that performs better than current scheduling algorithms. Scheduling is the process of assigning tasks to the CPU to optimize use. Because the CPU is the most important resource in a computer system, numerous scheduling approaches aim to maximize its use. The purpose of this study is to explore the CPU scheduler`s construction of high-quality scheduling algorithms that meet the scheduling objectives and to study the performance of a multilevel scheduling algorithm that combines two scheduling algorithms.

  Key-Words / Index Term
  CPU scheduling, Scheduler, Exponential Averaging, burst time, waiting time, turnaround time

  References
  [1] D. Goyal, “Comparative Analysis of Various Scheduling Algorithms,” International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Engineering & Technology, Volume 2, Issue 4, pp. 1488-1491,2013
  [2] Sonia Zouaoui, Lotfi Boussaid, Abdellatif Mtibaa, “Priority-based round robin (PBRR) CPU scheduling algorithm”, International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE) Vol. 9, No. 1, February 2019, pp. 190~202
  [3] C. Shekar, Karthik, “Analysis of Priority Scheduling Algorithm based on FCFS & SJF for Similar Priority Jobs [1],” pp.1-4,2017.
  [4] P. Surendra Varma, “A FINEST TIME QUANTUM FOR IMPROVING SHORTEST REMAINING BURST ROUND ROBIN (SRBRR) ALGORITHM,” Journal of Global Research in Computer Science, Volume 4, No.3, pp.10-15,2013.
  [5] O. Hani, M. Dorgham, “Improved Round Robin Algorithm: Proposed Method to Apply SJF using Geometric Mean” International Journal of Computer Science and Mobile Computing, Vol. 5, Iss. 11, pp. 112-119,2016.
  [6] A. Alsheikhy, R. Ammar, and R. Elfouly, “An improved dynamic Round Robin scheduling algorithm based on a variant quantum time,” In the Proceedings of the 2015 11th International Computer Engineering Conference, Egypt, pp.98-104, 2015
  [7] S. Elmougy, S. Sarhan, and M. Joundy, “A novel hybrid of Shortest job first and round Robin with dynamic variable quantum time task scheduling technique,” Journal of Cloud Computing, vol. 6, no. 1, Dec. 2017
  [8] G. Siva Nageswara Rao, R. Jayaraman, and S. V. N. Srinivasu, “Efficient PIMRR algorithm based on scheduling measures for improving real Time systems,” International Journal of Engineering and Technology(UAE), vol. 7, no. 2.32 Special Issue 32, pp.275–278, 2018
  [9] M. R. Khan and G. Kakhani, “Analysis of Priority Scheduling Algorithm on the Basis of FCFS & SJF for Similar Priority Jobs,” International Journal of Computer Science and Mobile Computing, Vol. 4, Issue. 9, pp.324 – 331, 2015.
  [10] M. M. Rashid, M. N. Akhtar, “A new multilevel CPU Scheduling algorithm,” Journal of Applied Sciences, vol. 6, no. 9, pp. 2036-2039, 2006.
  [11] J. Lee and K. G. Shin, “Preempt a job or not in EDF scheduling of uniprocessor systems,” IEEE Trans. Comput, vol. 63, no. 5, pp.1197–1206, 2014
  [12] O. Hani and M. Dorgham “Improved Round Robin Algorithm?: Proposed Method to Apply SJF using Geometric Mean” in the proceedings of 2019 2nd International Conference on Computer Applications & Information Security, vol. 5, no. 11, pp. 112–120, 2016.
  [13] S. Saeidi “Determining the Optimum Time Quantum Value in Round Robin Process Scheduling Method”, I.J. Information Technology and Computer Science, vol. 4, pp. 67–73, 2012.
  [14] S. Banerjee, A. Chowdhury, S. Mukherjee, and U. Biswas “An Approach Towards Development of a New Cloudlet Allocation Policy with Dynamic Time Quantum” Aut. Control Comp. Sci., vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 208–219, 2018.

  Citation
  Irshad Khan, Mohd Owais, Saima Aleem, Tasleem Jamal, "A Review on New Multilevel Scheduling Algorithm and SJF and Priority Scheduling Algorithms," International Journal of Scientific Research in Network Security and Communication, Vol.11, Issue.6, pp.1-8, 2023

• Open Access   Article

  A Survey of Linux Operating System as an Alternative to Other Operating Systems

  Vaishnavi Mishra, Saima Aleem, Shish Ahmad

  Review Paper | Journal (IJSRNSC)

  Vol.11 , Issue.6 , pp.9-14, Dec-2023

  Abstract

  Full-Text HTML

  References

  Citation

  Abstract
  Linux is an operating system for Intel 386/456/Pentium-based IBM PCs and is congenial. A worldwide group of enthusiastic volunteers has joined forces in developing many aspects of Linux on the INTERNET. Linux can run the powerful set of compilers and programming tools of free software foundation and X-free 86, a port of the X Windows system from MIT. One useful feature of Linux is its ability to coexist with other operating systems. Thus, a user invested in DOS/MS Windows software may continue running these applications on the machine and install them. Our scope for review of this paper is to study and review the Linux Operating system and its various features and functions such as History and Development, the Linux Kernel, Processes Scheduling in the Linux Operating System, Memory Management, I/O operations, networking and how it is done in the Linux OS.

  Key-Words / Index Term
  Multitasking, Virtual Memory, Shared Libraries, Memory management, CPU algorithm, Performance Evolution

  References
  [1]. Boras, M., Balen, J., & Vdovjak, K. (2020). Performance Evaluation of Linux Operating Systems. Proceedings of 2020 International Conference on Smart Systems and Technologies, SST, pp.115–120, 2020.
  [2]. Golam Muhammad Hasnain, S., rafi Rafi, A., & Ar Rafi, F. (2019). Windows, Linux, Mac Operating System, and Decision Making. In Article in International Journal of Computer Applications, Vol. 177, Issue 27, 2019.
  [3]. Olufunmilayo Olusanya, O., Ogunbanwo, A., & Opeyemi Lateef, U. 2016. MICROSOFT WINDOWS OPERATING SYSTEM Drought is the “Next Pandemic” View project A Cloud-based Scheme with Energy-Efficient RNS Homomorphic Encryption for Secured Deep CNN Classification of Dyslexia Neural-Biomarkers View project. 2016.
  [4]. Professor, A. (n.d.). An Analysis of Linux Operating System. In International Journal of Trend in Research and Development, Vol.3, Issue 1, pp.32-35, 2016.
  [5]. Sahu, A., Singh, A., & HOD Rahul Chawda, nd. 2021. RESEARCH PAPER ON OPERATING SYSTEM OPERATING SYSTEM. In International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts Vol.9, Issue 6, 2021.
  [6]. Sarki Abubakar, M. (n.d.). A Comparative Analysis of Operating System: Case Study of Windows Operating and Mackintosh Operating System.2021.
  [7]. Sharma, A., Mukhia, B., Thapa, N., Prasad, R. K., & Lal, A. 2016. A Review on Linux Distribution as Future Operating System. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Vol.7, Issue.4, 2016.
  [8]. Tariq Al-Rayes, H. 2012. Studying Main Differences Between Linux & Recent heuristic optimization algorithms in feature selection View project. In International Journal of Electrical & Computer SciencesIJECS-IJENS, Vol.12, 2012.

  Citation
  Vaishnavi Mishra, Saima Aleem, Shish Ahmad, "A Survey of Linux Operating System as an Alternative to Other Operating Systems," International Journal of Scientific Research in Network Security and Communication, Vol.11, Issue.6, pp.9-14, 2023

• Open Access   Article

  Unlocking Network Security and QoS: The Fusion of SDN, IoT, and Machine Learning: A Comprehensive Analysis

  S. Aleem, S. Ahmed

  Research Paper | Journal (IJSRNSC)

  Vol.11 , Issue.6 , pp.15-22, Dec-2023

  Abstract

  Full-Text HTML

  References

  Citation

  Abstract
  The convergence of Software-Defined Networking (SDN) and the Internet of Things (IoT) has ushered in transformative changes, offering unparalleled levels of network flexibility, programmability, and connectivity. While this integration provides numerous benefits, it also introduces security challenges. Motivated by the imperative to fortify the security posture in this dynamically evolving landscape, this review paper explores the vulnerabilities, threats, and corresponding responses in the security landscape of SDN and IoT. Recognizing the critical need for proactive security measures, the paper underscores the potential of Quality of Service (QoS) empowered by Machine Learning (ML) as a solution. By harnessing ML, QoS emerges as a powerful means to proactively identify and mitigate potential attacks, offering an effective approach to enhance network security. The motivation behind integrating QoS with ML lies in its ability to ensure dependability, availability, and integrity, thereby instilling confidence in the reliability and resilience of the interconnected world. The paper goes through examination of challenges, delving into the proactive management of QoS within SDN, intricacies of IoT network architectures, and the unique features and limitations of IoT systems. Furthermore, it comprehensively addresses potential countermeasures for various security threats, such as Denial of Service (DOS), Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attacks, and Ransomware attacks, particularly on devices with limited resources. This abstract provides a concise yet comprehensive overview of the paper`s motivations, emphasizing the urgency and significance of the proposed solutions for securing modern network environments.

  Key-Words / Index Term
  SDN, IoT, QoS, ML, DOS, MITM, WSN, M2M.

  References
  [1] Restuccia, F., D’Oro, S., Melodia, T. "Securing the Internet of Things in the Age of Machine Learning and Software-Defined Networking," IEEE Internet Things J, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 4829–4842, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2018.2846040.
  [2] Nauman, A., Qadri, Y. A., Amjad, M., bin Zikria, Y., Afzal, M. K., Kim, S. W. "Special Section On Mobile Multimedia: Methodology And Application Multimedia Internet Of Things: A Comprehensive Survey," pp. 1-54, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2964280.
  [3] Miorandi, D., Sicari, S., de Pellegrini, F., Chlamtac, I. "Internet of things: Vision, applications and research challenges," Ad Hoc Networks, vol. 10, no. 7, Elsevier B.V., pp. 1497–1516, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.adhoc.2012.02.016.
  [4] Sarker, I. H., Hoque, M. M., Uddin, M. K., Alsanoosy, T. "Mobile Data Science and Intelligent Apps: Concepts, AI-Based Modeling and Research Directions," Mobile Networks and Applications, vol. 26, no. 1, 2021, doi: pp 285–303 , 10.1007/s11036-020-01650-z.
  [5] Cui, L., Yang, S., Chen, F., Ming, Z., Lu, N., Qin, J. "A survey on the application of machine learning for the Internet of Things," International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics, vol. 9, no. 8, 2018, pp 1399-1417, doi: 10.1007/s13042-018-0834-5.
  [6] Hammad, K., Moubayed, A., Primak, S. L., Shami, A. "QoS-Aware Energy and Jitter-Efficient Downlink Predictive Scheduler for Heterogeneous Traffic LTE Networks," IEEE Trans Mob Comput, vol. 17, no. 6, 2018, pp 1468 - 1483 doi: 10.1109/TMC.2017.2771353.
  [7] Bhat, O., Gokhale, P., Bhat, S. "Introduction to IOT," International Advanced Research Journal in Science, Engineering and Technology ISO, vol. 3297, no. 1, 2007, pp 41-44 , doi: 10.17148/IARJSET.2018.517.
  [8] Mudgal, S., Pranjale, S., Mahajan, V. "Impact of Cyber-Attacks on Economy of Smart Grid and their Prevention," U.Porto Journal of Engineering (2022), pp. 51 – 64, DOI: 10.24840/2183-6493_008.002_0005.
  [9] Qin, Q., Poularakis, K., Tassiulas, L. "Bringing Intelligence at the Network Data Plane for Internet of Things Security," "IoT for Defense and National Security," 2022, Publisher Willey , pp- ch 14 doi: 10.1002/9781119892199.
  [10] Nguyen, K. T., Laurent, M., Oualha, N. "Survey on secure communication protocols for the Internet of Things," Ad Hoc Networks, vol. 32, pp. 17–31, Sep. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.adhoc.2015.01.006.
  [11] Airehrour, D., Gutierrez, J., & Ray, S. K. (2016). "Secure routing for Internet of Things: A survey." Journal of Network and Computer Applications, pp 198-213 doi: 10.1016/j.jnca.2016.03.006.
  [12] Vasilomanolakis, E., Daubert, J., Luthra, M., Gazis, V., Wiesmaier, A., & Kikiras, P. (2016). "On the Security and Privacy of Internet of Things Architectures and Systems." In Proceedings - 2015 International Workshop on Secure Internet of Things, SIoT 2015, pp. 49–57. doi: 10.1109/SIOT.2015.9.
  [13] Zhang, C., & Green, R. (2015). "Communication security in Internet of Things: Preventive measure and avoid DDoS attack over IoT network." Simulation Series, 47(3), pp 8–15.
  [14] Lygerou, I., Srinivasa, S., Vasilomanolakis, E., Stergiopoulos, G., & Gritzalis, D. (2023). "Correction to: A decentralized honeypot for IoT Protocols based on Android devices." International Journal of Information Security, 21(6), pp 1211-1222. doi: 10.1007/s10207-022-00605-7.
  [15] Krishnan, P., & Achuthan, K. (2019). "Managing network functions in stateful application aware SDN." Communications in Computer and Information Science. Pp 88-103, doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-5826-5_7.
  [16] Hossen, M. A., & Sang, J. Y. (2019). "Q-Learning Based Multi-Objective Clustering Algorithm for Cognitive Radio Ad Hoc Networks." IEEE Access., pp 181959 - 181971 doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2959313.
  [17] Schaller, S., & Hood, D. (2017). "Software-defined networking architecture standardization." Computers Standards & Interfaces, 54, pp 197–202. doi: 10.1016/j.csi.2017.01.005.
  [18] Lara, A., Kolasani, A., & Ramamurthy, B. (2014). "Network innovation using OpenFlow: a survey." IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, 16(1),pp 493–512. doi: 10.1109/SURV.2013.081313.00105.
  [19] Huang, X., et al. (2015). "Cost-effective authentic and anonymous data sharing with forward security." IEEE Transactions on Computers, 64(4), pp 971–983. doi: 10.1109/TC.2014.2315619.
  [20] Al-Garadi, M. A., Mohamed, A., Al-Ali, A. K., Du, X., Ali, I., & Guizani, M. (2020). "A Survey of Machine and Deep Learning Methods for Internet of Things (IoT) Security." IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, 22(3), pp 1646–1685. doi: 10.1109/COMST.2020.2988293.
  [21] F Restuccia, S D`Oro, & T Melodia,” Securing the Internet of Things in the Age of Machine Learning and Software-Defined Networking” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 5(6), PP 4829-4842. doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2018.2831526.
  [22] G. Kim, S. Lee, and S. Kim, "A novel hybrid intrusion detection method integrating anomaly detection with misuse detection," Expert Syst Appl, vol. 41, no. 4 PART 2, pp. 1690–1700, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2013.08.066.
  [23] D Rahmati; S A Hamid, "Classified Round Robin: A Simple Prioritized Arbitration to Equip Best Effort NoCs With Effective Hard QoS," IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, vol. 37, issue 1, pp. 257 - 269, January 2018. DOI: 10.1109/TCAD.2017.2693263.
  [24] S. Sicari, A. Rizzardi, L. A. Grieco, and A. Coen-Porisini, "Security, privacy and trust in Internet of things: The road ahead," Computer Networks, vol. 76, pp. 146–164, Jan. 15, 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.comnet.2014.11.008.
  [25] N. McLaughlin et al., "Deep android malware detection," in CODASPY 2017 - Proceedings of the 7th ACM Conference on Data and Application Security and Privacy, Mar. 2017, pp. 301–308. doi: 10.1145/3029806.3029823.
  [26] S. Skorobogatov, "Compromising device security via NVM controller vulnerability," 2020 IEEE Physical Assurance and Inspection of Electronics (PAINE), Washington, DC, USA, 2020, pp. 1-6, doi: 10.1109/PAINE49178.2020.933
  [27] S. Babar, A. Stango, N. Prasad, J. Sen, and R. Prasad, "Proposed embedded security framework for Internet of Things (IoT)," in 2011 2nd International Conference on Wireless Communication, Vehicular Technology, Information Theory and Aerospace and Electronic Systems Technology, Wireless VITAE 2011, 2011. Pp art. no. 5940923 doi: 10.1109/WIRELESSVITAE.2011.5940923.
  [28] K. Petersen, R. Feldt, S. Mujtaba, and M. Mattsson, "Systematic Mapping Studies in Software Engineering." Pp 1-10.
  [29] Renya Nath N, Hiran V Nath. "Critical analysis of the layered and systematic approaches for understanding IoT security threats and challenges," IEEE Computers and Electrical Engineering, Volume 100, pp 2-17, May 2022.
  [30] I. Ahammad, M. A. Rahman Khan, Z. U. Salehin, M. Uddin, and S. J. Soheli, "Improvement of QoS in an IoT ecosystem by integrating fog computing and SDN," International Journal of Cloud Applications and Computing, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 48–66, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.4018/IJCAC.2021040104.
  [31] G. Kurt et al., “A Vision and Framework for the High-Altitude Platform Station (HAPS) Networks of the Future,” Jul. 2020, pp 729-799.
  [32] A. Roy, T. Acharya, and S. DasBit, “Quality of service in delay tolerant networks: A survey,” Computer Networks, vol. 130. Elsevier B.V., pp. 121–133, Jan. 15, 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.comnet.2017.11.010.
  [33] F. S Biswas, “QOS-AWARE SCHEDULING,” United State Patent, Patent no. US 9,135,072 B2, Sep. 2015, Corpus ID: 44736585, pp 1-10 .
  [34] J. A. C. Gary G. Warden, “Systems and methods for providing quality of service (QoS) in an environment that does not normally support QoS features,” Jun. 2008. Pp 1-12.
  [35] S. Kalyani, “Measurement and Analysis of QoS Parameters in RPL Network,” 2018, pp. 307-312.
  [36] M. Sedrati, “Evaluation of QoS parameters with RPL protocol in the internet of things,” in ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, Jul. 2017, vol. Part F130657, pp. 86–91. doi: 10.1145/3129186.3129204.
  [37] M. R. Parsaei, M. J. Sobouti, S. Raouf, and R. Javidan, “Network Traffic Classification using Machine Learning Techniques over Software Defined Networks,” 2017. Pp 219-225.
  [38] A. ?olakovi? and M. Hadžiali?, “Internet of Things (IoT): A review of enabling technologies, challenges, and open research issues,” Computer Networks, vol. 144. Elsevier B.V., pp. 17–39, Oct. 24, 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.comnet.2018.07.017.
  [39] Y. Yamsanwar and S. Sutar, “Performance analysis of wireless sensor networks for QoS,” in 2017 International Conference on Big Data, IoT and Data Science, BID 2017, 2018, vol. 2018-January, pp 120-123, doi: 10.1109/BID.2017.8336584.
  [40] Vivek S., “Performance analysis of FMAC protocol for reporting rate in wireless sensor networks,” 2016, pp1-5 .
  [41] J. Granjal, E. Monteiro, and J. Sa Silva, “Security for the internet of things: A survey of existing protocols and open research issues,” IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 1294–1312, Jul. 2015, doi: 10.1109/COMST.2015.2388550.
  [42] M Díaz, C Martín, & B Rubio” State-of-the-art, challenges, and open issues in the integration of Internet of Things and cloud computing.” Journal of Network and Computer Applications, vol. 67, pp 99-117.
  [43] D. Gil, A. Ferrández, H. Mora-Mora, and J. Peral, “Internet of things: A review of surveys based on context aware intelligent services,” Sensors (Switzerland), vol. 16, no. 7. MDPI AG, Jul. 11, 2016.pp 1-23, doi: 10.3390/s16071069.
  [44] G. White, V. Nallur, and S. Clarke, “Quality of service approaches in IoT: A systematic mapping,” Journal of Systems and Software, vol. 132, pp. 186–203, Oct. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.05.125.
  [45] A. Riahi Sfar, E. Natalizio, Y. Challal, and Z. Chtourou, “A roadmap for security challenges in the Internet of Things,” Digital Communications and Networks, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 118–137, Apr. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.dcan.2017.04.003.
  [46] M. binti Mohamad Noor and W. H. Hassan, “Current research on Internet of Things (IoT) security: A survey,” Computer Networks, vol. 148, 2019, pp 283- 294 doi: 10.1016/j.comnet.2018.11.025.
  [47] T. T. T. Nguyen and G. Armitage, “A survey of techniques for internet traffic classification using machine learning,” IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, vol. 10, no. 4. 2008, pp 56-76, doi: 10.1109/SURV.2008.080406.
  [48] S A Fadhil,”. Internet of Things security threats and key technologies. Journal of Discrete Mathematical Sciences and Cryptography, Pages 1951-1957, 25 Oct 2021.
  [49] Sahraoui, S., & Bilami, A. (2015). Efficient HIP-based approach to ensure lightweight end-to-end security in the internet of things. Computer Networks, Volume 19 14 November 2015, PP 26-45.
  [50] S. Chen and K. Nahrstedt, “An Overview of Quality-of-Service Routing for Next-Generation High-speed Networks: Problems and Solutions.” Pp 64-79.
  [51] M. U. Akram, M. Rizwan Asghar, M. A. Naeem, H. A. Khan, and H. Farooq, "Secure QoS Provisioning for SDN-based IoT Networks using Machine Learning," IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 11120-11136, 2021. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.305113.
  [52] K. K. Patel, & S. M Patel,” Internet of Things (IoT): Definition, Characteristics, Architecture, Enabling Technologies, Application & Future Challenges” International Journal of Engineering Science and Computing, May 2016, PP- 6122-6131.
  [53] P Sethi, S R Sarangi, “ Internet of Things: Architectures, Protocols, and Applications. Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering” Volume 2017, Article ID 9324035. Pp 1-25, doi:10.1155/2017/9324035.

  Citation
  S. Aleem, S. Ahmed, "Unlocking Network Security and QoS: The Fusion of SDN, IoT, and Machine Learning: A Comprehensive Analysis," International Journal of Scientific Research in Network Security and Communication, Vol.11, Issue.6, pp.15-22, 2023